2014年10月2日木曜日

big dreams

Last night, we had a welcome party for new students, and their big dreams reminded me of my own dream I'd had when I entered med school.

If you've read my past entries, you probably know I tend to dream big.  As well as wanting to be a writer, saving the lives of people in developing countries has been my dream since high school.  I realize there's no difference between staying in my country and treating people here, and going abroad to treat people there.  If there's some kind of a philosophy behind it, it's just that I think I was lucky to have been born in Japan and as my parents' child, and I feel I should at least help people who weren't as "lucky" as I happened to be.  But in the end, it's probably just another way to feed my huge ego.  And I realized it clearly last night, as I conversed with a new student who had just come back from Uganda where he had worked as a veterinarian.

He said his dream was to work as a member of Doctors without Borders and eventually get a job in the WHO.  I think it's a great dream, and regarding the fact that he has already worked in Uganda, I'm pretty sure he has the guts to make his dreams come true.  The only problem I had with him (apart from the fact that he kept spitting at me and into my plate with every other word he spoke) was that he didn't seem to see what was right in front of him because he was too busy looking at Africa.  He wasn't a bad person at all; I actually even liked him a bit, but I thought I didn't want to be like him.  I don't want to forget the things lying in front of me.  I guess I've realized lately that it's really the small things that matter to me.

A couple of weeks ago, our emergency medicine professor told us about how he had saved a three month year old baby and he was outraged that some stupid doctor had criticized him for saving such a child -- hardly a human being -- who would have to live the rest of his life with serious disabilities.  I was amazed that the professor seemed to have no doubt whatsoever that what he had done was perfectly "right".  I realize that when you practice medicine, you sometimes end up forcing upon patients (and their families) the sense of value that being alive means everything.  Even if you can't walk or talk or go to the toilet on your own, it's great just being alive.  I want to believe it's true.  We need to make a society that makes this true.  But in reality, I'm not quite sure.  Doctors save lives and feel happy.  But what do they know about what happens to those lives they save?  After all, who feeds the kid for the rest of his life?  Who can guarantee that those lives in developing countries saved by foreign doctors who return home to their warm beds and meals, find the same warm shelter and enough food?  What if the country can't support that many people?

I don't want to forget that it's harder to save lives than we usually think it is.  I want to remember that we can be wrong.  I don't know if I still want to work abroad, but regardless of where I work, I want to live with humility.

1 件のコメント:

  1. Yes, in whole, I agree with you.

    However, I think the central point of our most formidable problem which we face...the progenitor of all other problems...one of over population...is not of whether or not to control the death rate. It is one of correctly controlling the rate of conception.

    So far as the moral dilemma forced upon the professor...bravo for him.
    He had made the only moral choice he could have. The real problem is society's lack of moral and political will in helping those who cannot fend for themselves. Although I despise any form of a Marxist ideology in any form...it does not mean that to take care of all those who CANNOT do for themselves is somehow Socialistic (my argument...I know this is not what was either expressed, or implied, by you). Give nothing (by governmental decree...I do not mean by volunteerism), except unlimited opportunity, to those who can do for themselves and choose to not do. Give generously to those who, by no choice of their own, cannot do for themselves. Any child born with such a condition as to not allow him to function on his own must be taken care of if a society is to deem itself as being moral. The same applies to long term comatose patients...etc.. Only the most grievously handicapped person truly cannot do for himself. All others can be made productive and happy through proper societal support.

    So far as your moral dilemma, I think it is easiest thought of in the micro sense.
    Would you choose to help someone not known to you over one of your own family were they in the same condition at the same time?

    The answer then becomes simple. There is nothing wrong with taking care of your own...first and foremost.

    For those who think otherwise...

    this is precisely why none of you is sharing your home with the many thousands of homeless in your own nation (nor do I). And for those who live in the cities...in your own neighborhood. That which applies to the micro...applies to the macro...and to all. This is what makes it moral.



    返信削除